Search Results for "IPC 511"

211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in MMDR Act Cases Due to Lack of Authorisation. Police Registration of FIR for Mining Offences Without Competent Authority's Complaint Held Invalid Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

A batch of criminal petitions was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 Read with 511 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Contradicts Prosecution Story of Attempted Rape.

The appellant, Shankar Thakre, was convicted by the Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial 33/2002 for offences under Section 363 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution evidence was contradictory and unreliable.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by Ramesh Durgappa Hirekerur, Rohit Ira Mudgal, and Mahesh @ Mendis Govindappa Bovi against their convi...