Search Results for "IPC 494"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against In-Laws in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Vague and Omnibus Allegations Against Family Members Without Active Involvement Do Not Attract Offences Under Sections 498A and 494 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the accused-appellants, who were the father-in-law, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law of the complainant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Explanation — Section 468 CrPC Limitation Bars Prosecution for Offences Under Sections 498A, 494, 506 IPC Alleged After 24 Years.

The petitioner, Mahesh R., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the order of cognizance taken by the IV Additional Senior...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Bigamy Case Under Section 482 CrPC Due to Abuse of Process. Family Court's Binding Finding That Accused Had No Prior Subsisting Marriage Renders Complaint Under Sections 494 and 495 IPC Meritless, Preventing Reagitation of Decided Issue.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Single Judge of the Gauhati High Court dated 4 April 2018, which dismissed an application under Section 482 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 323, 494 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as dying declarations were inconsistent and not corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellants, Shobha Jahangir Shinde and Jahangir Srirang Shinde, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and State's Appeal for Fine. Case Involves Issues of Identity, Motive, and Recovery Under Sections 302 and 34 IPC.

The appeals arose from the judgment of the Fast Track (Sessions) Judge-V, Bengaluru City, in S.C. No. 1199/2012, convicting the accused under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Bigamy Case — Marriage Not Proved as Customary Divorce Established. Appellant failed to prove that her marriage with accused No.1 was subsisting at the time of his second marriage under Section 494 IPC.

The appellant, Smt. Tayawwa, filed a private complaint under Section 200 CrPC alleging that her husband, Narasappa (accused No.1), married her accordi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in VAT Evasion Case — IPC Offences Not Invokable When Special Statute Exists. FIR under IPC and MVAT Act quashed as investigation under MVAT Act must be by VAT authorities, not police, and IPC cannot be invoked for acts covered by special statute.

The petitioners, directors of G.S. Oils Ltd., challenged FIR No. 139/2012 registered at Police Station Wani for offences under Sections 406, 409, 420,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Applicability of Section 498A IPC to Live-in Relationships. The Core Issue is Whether a Man in a Void Marriage or a Relationship in the Nature of Marriage Can Be Prosecuted as a 'Husband' Under Section 498A Indian Penal Code.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal against the High Court of Karnataka's refusal to quash criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC, among other prov...