Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(j3) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Government Grant of Land for Residential Purpose Does Not Amount to Encroachment, Hence Disqualification Set Aside.

The petitioner, Gajanan Susar, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat of village Jamb in August 2009. The respondent no.3 filed an application ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Payment of Tax by Husband/Father-in-Law. Holds That Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Does Not Impose Vicarious Liability for Spouse's Tax Default.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh, allowed two writ petitions challenging the disqualification of the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election in Gram Panchayat Dispute — No Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 for Failure to Pay Tax When No Tax Was Imposed.

The case involves a dispute regarding the election of the Up-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Sukli, District Akola. The petitioners, who are members of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election Due to Absence of Notice. Court Holds That Presence and Participation of All Members Cures Any Defect in Notice Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who were members of Gram Panchayat Sukli, challenged the election of respondent no.6 as Up-Sarpanch. The election was held on 23.05.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Petitioner's removal upheld as meeting complied with procedural requirements under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Rules.

The petitioner, Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talegaon Dashasar. On 05.12.2016, a no confidence motion was pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Interest in Contracts Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Payments to Husband's Relatives Constitute Disqualification.

The petitioner, Archana Neharkar, was the Sarpanch of Kutewadi Grampanchayat in Beed district. She was disqualified by the Collector, Beed, on 5 Janua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(h) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Failure to Prove Demand and Default Within Three Months Renders Disqualification Invalid.

The petitioner, Vishwanath s/o Kisan Dhage, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Wara Jahangir, in 2015. Respondent No.4, Suresh Ashruji Gawande...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Disqualification Order Against Woman Sarpanch for Failure to Hold Gram Sabha Meeting on Republic Day. Interpretation of Rule 3(2) of Gram Sabha Rules Indicates Meeting Date Not Mandatory, and Onus on Officials to Guide New Electee.

The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe woman, was directly elected Sarpanch of village Mundgaon on 20.12.2022 and assumed office on 04.01.2023. Respondent ...