Search Results for "Gram Panchayat Election"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Gram Panchayat Election"

436 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notification for Gram Panchayats Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Rotation Policy. Failure to Follow Section 161 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 and Rule 3 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1997 Rendered the Impugned List Invalid.

3 Jul 2023

The petitioners, Durgappa and Sharanamma, were Presidents of Bappur Gram Panchayat and Tidigol Gram Panchayat respectively. They filed a writ petition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Gram Panchayat Election Due to Non-Compliance with Toilet Requirement Under Section 14(1)(j-5) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The Court held that the Returning Officer must give an opportunity to the candidate to explain or produce documents before rejecting nomination.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Sushila Sukram Naik, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the rejection of her nominat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum in Gram Panchayat Reservation Case — State Cannot Alter Reservation After Election Process Begins. Corrigendum Issued After Publication of Final Reservation List and Commencement of Election Process Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

5 Jun 2018

The petitioners, seven Gram Panchayats in Parli-Vaijnath taluka, Beed district, constituted under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Member Challenging Disqualification as Gram Rojgar Sevak. Post of Gram Rojgar Sevak under MGNREGA is not an office of profit under Section 14(1)(f) or (g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

30 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Santosh Jagannath Galbe, was an elected member of the Village Panchayat, Devegaon, Parbhani, and also worked as a Gram Rojgar Sevak un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Election of Sarpanch and UpSarpanch by Draw of Lots. Inclusion of Blank Chits in Draw Does Not Invalidate Election Under Section 33(4) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1960 and Rule 16 of Election Rules, 1964.

14 Mar 2011

The case involves an appeal against a Single Judge's order that upheld the election of respondents as Sarpanch and UpSarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wadhon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging APMC Election Without Inclusion of Gram-Panchayat Members in Voters' List. Election process of APMC Tumsar set aside for non-compliance with Section 11(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963.

8 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Sadashiv Shivaji Dhenge, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram-Panchayat Hardoli in 2017, which falls within the territorial jurisdiction of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Pre-existing Encroachment — Section 14(1)(j-3) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Not Attracted for Encroachment Made Prior to Election. The court held that the disqualification provision applies only to encroachments made after the member's election or during his tenure, and since the construction was made in 1996 and assessed by the Gram Panchayat from 2000, the petitioner could not be disqualified.

5 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Santosh Maruti Walanj, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat Shelar, Taluka Bhivandi, District Thane, from a ward reserved for Sch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Upa-Sarpanch's Petition Challenging Election Set-Aside — Election by Show of Hands Valid Under Rule 5(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1962. Court holds that secret ballot is not mandatory unless a poll is demanded, and the Presiding Officer has discretion to decide the mode of voting.

18 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Aarti w/o Santosh Pawar, was the Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchyat Pangri, District Jalna. She challenged the judgment and order dated 16.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Temporary Injunction Restraining Gram Panchayat President in Election Dispute — Rule 14 of Karnataka Panchayath Raj (Election of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayath) Rules, 1995 Bars Civil Court from Granting Injunction in Election Matters.

3 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Sri Malappa, was elected as President of Vatadahosahalli Gram Panchayat following elections held on 2 June 2015 under the Karnataka Pa...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)