Search Results for "Government instrument"

1154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act — Purpose of Instrument Failed. Development Agreement is an instrument covered under Section 47(c)(5) for refund when the purpose fails, and Section 48 is only a limitation provision.

The petitioner, M/s. Chandiwala Enterprises, a registered partnership firm, entered into a Development Agreement with Neel Ashiward CHS Ltd. on 2nd Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses LIC's Appeal on Stamp Duty for Insurance Policies in Rajasthan. State Has Legislative Competence Under Concurrent List to Collect Stamp Duty on Insurance Policies, But Relief Granted on Facts.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) against a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which upheld th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitrator Appointment Due to Unstamped Lease Deed. Insufficiently Stamped Document Cannot Be Acted Upon Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Karnataka High Court appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Dispute — Security-cum-Mortgage Bond for Guaranteeing Third-Party Loan is Collateral Security Under Article 40(c) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, Not a Mortgage Deed Under Article 40(a).

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Joint District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, Nagpur, and the Chief Controlling Revenue Authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Karnataka Appellate Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Lack of Proper Consideration of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind to the Definition of 'Conveyance' Under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

The petitioners, M/s. Motwani Builders and M/s. B. Alim Builders, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case, Reduces Fine Amount. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding cheque issued for repayment of loan.

The case arises from a complaint filed by M/s. Meenakshi Developers (respondent/complainant) against Sri V.V. Chari (petitioner/accused) under Section...