Search Results for "Forest Offence"

254 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 254 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 104-A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 set aside as prosecution failed to prove illegal transportation of sandalwood beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioners, four individuals, were convicted by the Trial Court (Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi) in C.C. No. 5462/2006 for an offence under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Forest Officer in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Failure to Prove Incident Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Manner of Occurrence.

The appellant, Sukumaran, a Forest Range Officer, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri, for offences under Sections 302 and 203 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Assault Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 353 and 307 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove appellant's presence at the scene beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Thomas, was accused No.2 in a case arising from an incident on 18.07.2006 where a group of persons allegedly assaulted forest officials...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Tiger Poaching Case Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 — Accused Found to Be Financier and Key Link in Transnational Wildlife Trafficking.

The State of Maharashtra (Forest Department) filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking cancellation of ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation Order in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner's Wood Seized Without Proper Notice Under Section 61A of Indian Forest Act, 1927. Confiscation Proceedings Initiated Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Namdeo Narayan Dekate, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of an order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 325 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pandurang s/o Tukaram Shinde, was convicted by the Special Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No. 53 of 1998 for an offence punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Forest Department's Writ Petitions Against Acquittal in Forest Offence Cases. Court holds that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of independent witnesses and procedural irregularities under Indian Forest Act, 1927.

The case involves eight writ petitions filed by the Divisional Forest Officer and Range Forest Officer, Gondia, challenging the acquittal of responden...