Search Results for "Fixtures removal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Fixtures removal"

28 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Violation of Status Quo Order in Arbitration Dispute. Status Quo Order Ambiguous and Not Willfully Disobeyed by Respondents in Sale of Flats Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Jul 2026

The judgment arises from a contempt petition filed by Amkhim Holdings Pvt. Ltd. and Vasant Kotak & Bros. Trading & Investments Pvt. Ltd. against respo...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by Oil Corporation in Contract Termination Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Direction to Handover Vacant Possession. Corporation Directed to Remove Fixtures and Equipments Within Two Weeks; Liberty Given to Invoke Contract Clauses for Damages.

26 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from a dealership agreement between Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) and M/s A.R.Agencies, a petroleum dealer. IOCL, as the oil...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows TIIC's Recovery Petition Against Guarantors in SFC Act Case — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Liability of Guarantors Under Sections 31(a) and 31(aa) of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Survives Liquidation of Principal Borrower and Receipt of Amount from Official Liquidator.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited (TIIC), a State Financial Corporation, filed an original petition under Sections ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging University Regulations on Migration from 3-Year LL.B to 5-Year Integrated Law Course. The court held that the Bar Council of India Rules of Legal Education, 2008 do not permit migration from a 3-year LL.B course to a 5-year integrated law course, and the university regulations were valid.

27 Aug 2018

The petitioners, two students who had completed a 3-year LL.B degree course, sought to migrate to the 4th year of a 5-year integrated B.A., LL.B cours...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, renders an arbitral award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Apr 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partnership Act Bar Case — Agreement Held as Licence Not Lease. Suit for Eviction by Unregistered Partnership Firm Not Barred Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as Right to Evict Trespasser Arises from Common Law.

13 Mar 2015

The case involves a second appeal filed by M/s Hotel Satkar, an unregistered partnership firm, against the dismissal of their suit for eviction of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Property Tax Refund Suit Filed by Co-operative Housing Society. Limitation for Refund Claim Runs from Date of Final Assessment Order, Not from Date of Payment, Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) appealed against a decree passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, in a suit filed by Kalpita Enclav...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of MOIL Employees — Transfer Policy Upheld as Non-Discriminatory and in Public Interest. Transfer orders of 24 employees of MOIL Limited were challenged as arbitrary and violative of transfer policy; court held that transfers were in public interest and no mala fides established.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 24 employees of MOIL Limited, a public sector undertaking, filed a writ petition challenging their transfer orders issued by the mana...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)