Search Results for "Financial Technologies India Limited"

247 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Share Transfer Validity and Limitation. Rectification of Register of Members under Sections 59 and 88 of Companies Act, 2013 requires proof of valid share transfer and petition within limitation.

The case involves an appeal by Chalasani Udaya Shankar and others against M/s. Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and others, arising from a company petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 75% Deposit Under Section 21 of RDB Act in Debt Recovery Appeal — No Waiver Granted as Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case or Financial Hardship.

The petitioner, M/s. Sterlite Technologies Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Debts Recover...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434.

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor Seeking Performance Pay Under IBC — Claim for Performance Pay Not an 'Operational Debt' Under Section 5(21) of IBC, 2016 as It Is Discretionary and Not Based on Provision of Goods or Services.

The appeal was filed by M. Ramakanth, an operational creditor, against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad, which dismissed his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Challenge to GST Demand Confirmation Order. Petition Challenges Order Confirming GST Demand of Rs 70.57 Crores for April 2020 to March 2021.

The petitioner, GlobeOp Financial Services (India) Private Limited (the surviving entity after its merger with GlobeOp Financial Services Technologies...