Search Results for "Extra Duty Deposit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Extra Duty Deposit"

144 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeals Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings. The Commission set aside the common order dated 11.09.2024 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of execution applications under Sections 25 and 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Aug 2025

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard appeals (AE No. 73/2024 and AE No. 74/2024) filed by the complainant/decree holder, ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Execution Appeals in Consumer Dispute Over Flat Possession — Directions Issued for Compliance Under Sections 25 and 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The decree holder is entitled to pursue both execution remedies simultaneously without being compelled to elect between them.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves execution appeals filed by the decree holder, Kishore Bhardwaj, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 of the State Consumer Disput...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging MPID Act Application in NSEL Scam Case — Held That MPID Act Applies to NSEL as a Financial Establishment and That Default in Repayment of Deposits Attracts Offences Under the Act.

7 Feb 2025

The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals and interim applications filed by various parties, including directors, brokers, and financial inst...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Injured Claimant's Cross-Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Loss of Future Income Due to Permanent Disability. The court applied a multiplier of 13 and notional income of Rs.9,000 per month under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 173(1), enhancing compensation from Rs.4,81,600 to Rs.5,41,200.

28 Nov 2022

The case involves a motor accident claim arising from an accident that occurred on 18.12.2015 involving a Bolero goods vehicle bearing No. KA-16-B-566...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Wilful Default in Rent Payment Despite Prior Condonation Under Section 22(3) of Goa Rent Control Act. Tenant's repeated default and failure to pay rent for 14 months justifies eviction, and benefit under Section 22(3) cannot be claimed more than once.

27 Apr 2017

The case involves a dispute between landlords (respondents) and a tenant (petitioner) over eviction from suit premises let out in January 1966 for a r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Petitioner's right to prosecute respondent for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 revived after respondent failed to deposit amount as directed.

4 May 2006

The petitioner, Anil Prabhakar Naik, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondents for ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)