Search Results for "Explosive substances"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Orders in Murder Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by High Court. Bail granted under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149, 120-B IPC and Explosive Substances Act set aside for lack of proper consideration of evidence.

The appellant, the father of the deceased Ashfaque Ahmad, challenged two orders of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 23.09.2021 granting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Stale Material. Detenu Granted Bail Months Before Detention Order, Conditions Fulfilled, No Breach of Public Order Established.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the preventive detention of the detenu under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Case Due to Long Incarceration and Delay in Trial. Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Prevails Over Statutory Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) UAPA When Trial Cannot Be Completed in Reasonable Time.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya, accused no. 6 in a case investigated by the National Investigation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in UAPA Case: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Special Court for Extension of Investigation Period. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues upon expiry of 90 days and is not defeated by subsequent filing of charge sheet if application was made before filing.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Bikramjit Singh, who was arrested in connection with a grenade attack at a Nirankari Bhawan in Amritsar on 18....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Police Officer for Dereliction of Duty in Dinakaran Arson Case. Failure to Prevent Attack and Apprehend Criminals Under Sections 217 and 221 IPC.

The case arises from the tragic Dinakaran newspaper arson incident on May 9, 2007, where a mob attacked the office, resulting in the death of three em...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanction — Prior Sanction Under Section 20A(2) TADA Must Show Application of Mind. The Designated Court's finding of non-application of mind in sanction order was upheld, and the prosecution could not proceed under TADA.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of three respondents by the Designated Judge, Jamnagar, in Special TADA Case Nos.3/1994, 3/1997, a...