Search Results for "Expeditious Enquiry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Expeditious Enquiry"

273 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 273 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

8 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

23 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Disciplinary Proceedings Against Police Officer for Illegal Gunda Squad Operation. Charge-Sheet Under All India Services Rules Not Vague, Delay Alone Does Not Vitiate Enquiry Without Demonstrated Prejudice, Directs Expeditious Conclusion.

6 Sep 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dated 5 September 2019, which affirmed the Tribunal's order quashing a disciplina...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Section 138 NI Act Case — Cheque Not Drawn on Accused's Account. Applicant cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cheque was drawn on the account of a proprietorship firm, not on the personal account of the accused.

12 Feb 2016

The applicant, Dr. (Mrs) Rajul Ketan Raj, was accused no.1 in three complaints filed by Reliance Capital Ltd. under Section 138 of the Negotiable Inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Departmental Enquiry Despite Pending Criminal Case in Bribery Allegation Against Accounts Officer. The court held that there is no automatic stay of departmental enquiry due to pendency of criminal proceedings, and the standard of proof in departmental enquiry is preponderance of probabilities.

22 Sep 2015

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) dated 20.11.2013 in Original App...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employees' Writ Petitions Against Industrial Court's Refusal to Register Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act. Industrial Court Cannot Reject Revision at Threshold on Ground of Interlocutory Order.

28 Nov 2013

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by employees challenging the refusal of the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar, to register their Revision (U...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court's Rejection of Industrial Dispute Under Section 10(4-A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Labour Court Failed to Adjudicate Issues Framed Regarding Fairness of Domestic Enquiry and Sustainability of Dismissal Order, Leading to Remand.

27 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Shri V. Ramachandrappa, a workman employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC), was dismissed from service by an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Quashing Charge Memo Due to Delay and Quasi-Judicial Functions. The Court Held That Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After 8 Years for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duties as Income Tax Officer Were Unjustified and Caused Prejudice to the Employee.

13 Feb 2013

The Union of India and others filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Central Admini...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)