Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
Search Results for "Exit Permit"
145 result(s) found
Found 145 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Direction to Consider Visa Application of Iraqi National — Medical Visa Application Must Be Decided Within Two Weeks. Court Directs Respondents to Consider Application Dated 22.02.2024 Expeditiously Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
24 Apr 2024The petitioner, Sri Sagad Kareem Ismael, a citizen of Baghdad, Iraq, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India see...
- 156
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.
9 Nov 2023The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition of Chinese National Seeking Visa Extension and Quashing of Leave India Notice. Petitioner Admitted Overstaying e-Visa Condition of 180 Days Continuous Stay, Court Declines to Interfere Under Foreigners Act, 1946.
3 Dec 2021The petitioner, Li Dong, a national of the People's Republic of China, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India b...
- 178
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.
23 Jul 2021The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...
- 340
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Transposition of Defendant as Plaintiff in Partnership Dissolution Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1A CPC. The court held that a defendant with a substantial interest in the suit can be transposed as plaintiff when the original plaintiff seeks withdrawal after a preliminary decree.
15 Feb 2021The case involves a suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts filed in 1986. A preliminary decree for dissolution was passed on 31...
- 79
High Court
High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute Despite Unstamped Agreement. Arbitration Clause Held Separable and Enforceable Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2 Jan 2019The petitioners, Mr. M.N. Kumar, Mr. R. Venkata Krishna, and Mr. C.S. Mohan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitrati...
- 17
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause.
2 Jan 2019The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole ...
- 203
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition by Concessionaire Challenging NOC for Access to Retail Outlet on BOT Highway. Key Legal Question is Whether Concessionaire’s Statutory and Contractual Rights to Control Access Override Highway Administration’s Power to Grant Access Permissions Under Section 8A of National Highways Act, 1956.
24 Oct 2017The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Nandi Highway Developers Ltd (the concessionaire) challenging a no-objection certificate (NOC) dated 2...
- 10
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.
1 Jan 1970The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...
- 30
