Search Results for "Equity Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Equity Jurisdiction"

2676 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2676 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Return of Shares and Dividends in Commercial Suit — Plaintiff Stockbroker Entitled to 11,25,000 ITC Shares and Accrued Dividends After Full Satisfaction of Debt Under One Time Settlement. Court Holds That Once Debt Is Fully Satisfied, Bank Must Return All Pledged Securities and Cannot Retain Them as Collateral for Other Debts.

10 Mar 2025

The Plaintiff, Shrikant G. Mantri, a stockbroker and registered member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, filed a commercial suit against Punjab National B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Application — Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares Held as Debt, Not Investment. The Court held that CRPS constitute a debt under Section 3(11) of IBC, 2016, and the appellant is a financial creditor entitled to file an application under Section 7.

9 Dec 2025

The appeal arises from the dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the NCLT and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute on Amalgamation Scheme — Reduction of Share Capital Prior to Merger Must Be Considered for Valuation. Court holds that stamp duty under Article 25(da) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 is payable on the market value of shares as on appointed date, which includes the reduced share capital sanctioned by High Court.

25 Sep 2024

The petitioner, J. P. Morgan Securities India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of its appeal under Section 53(1A) of the Mah...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

24 Aug 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds CLB Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Share Conversion and Board Reconstitution Upheld. The court affirmed that the conversion of preference shares into equity shares under a Share Subscription cum Shareholders Agreement was valid and that the CLB correctly found oppression and mismanagement by the promoters.

7 Jan 2016

The case involves appeals against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition filed by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 under Sections 397 and 398 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Wartsila India Limited — Court Approves Special Resolution for Reduction of Share Capital to Provide Exit to Minority Shareholders, Rejecting Oppression Allegations. The Court held that the reduction was bona fide and not oppressive, and confirmed the reduction under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 1956.

15 Nov 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Petition filed by Wartsila India Limited (WIL) seeking confirmation of a special resolution passed on 10th November 20...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds CLB Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Conversion of Preference Shares and Board Reconstitution Upheld. Share Subscription cum Shareholders Agreement and Articles of Association amendments validly passed; conversion of preference shares into equity shares resulting in majority shareholding for investors was lawful.

7 Jan 2016

The case involves appeals against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition filed by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 under Sections 397 and 398 of...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

24 Apr 2015

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Enforcement of Singapore Anti-Suit Order in NCLT Oppression and Mismanagement Dispute. Court holds that disputes under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 are non-arbitrable and exclusively triable by NCLT, and that an anti-suit injunction from a foreign court cannot be enforced in India to prevent a party from pursuing statutory remedies before the NCLT.

11 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Anupam Mittal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking an anti-anti-suit injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiff's claim for declaration of share ownership and rectification of register barred by limitation under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 as cause of action arose in 1998 but suit filed in 2008.

16 Mar 2017

The plaintiff, Messer Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in British Virgin Islands, filed a suit in 2008 seeking a declaration that it is the ow...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)