Search Results for "Employer Challenge"

1787 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1787 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Appellants, Setting Aside High Court Order Imposing Penalty Liability on Insurance Company Under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 -- Employer Solely Liable for Penalty Under Section 4A(3)(b) as Per Ved Prakash Garg Judgment

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by Appellants, challenging the Delhi High Court's order that imposed liability for penalty under Section 4A(3)(b)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition and Allows Employee's Petition in Service Dispute Over Dismissal on Unproven Charges. Employer Cannot Use Loss of Confidence to Bypass Disciplinary Proceedings When Charges of Misconduct Are Not Proved.

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from an Industrial Court order dated 12 July 2005. The employer, Agricultural Produce Market Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...