Search Results for "Easementary Rights"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Order Striking Off Defence in Easement Suit — Inquiry Required Before Penalty Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC. The court held that striking off defence is a harsh order and can only be passed after an inquiry establishing wilful disobedience of an injunction order.

The appellants, original defendants in a suit for easementary rights, challenged an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Quepem dated 16.9.2020,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Tenancy Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Agricultural Tenancy Act as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Easementary Rights and Possessory Remedies.

The petitioner, Comunidade of Calapur, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the CPC challenging the order dated 07/09/2017 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Fishermen Cooperative's Petition Against Demolition of Fishermen Huts in Coastal Zone. Court Holds That Traditional Fishing Communities Have Customary Rights to Occupy Foreshore Land for Livelihood, Subject to Environmental Clearances Under CRZ Notification, 2011.

The petitioner, Mariyayi Macchimaar Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, a cooperative society of traditional fishermen, filed a writ petition challenging the pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Permitting Withdrawal of Suit with Liberty to File Fresh Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Defect in Map and Incomplete Prayers Constitute Formal Defect.

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the original defendant, Kashinath Badhe, challenging an order of the trial court dated 07/0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Construction on Community Land in Orlim, Goa. Petitioners failed to establish any legal right or title over the suit property, and the challenge to the construction was held to be not maintainable.

The petitioners, thirteen residents of Orlim, Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court a...