Search Results for "Dhulabhai principles"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Dhulabhai principles"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revision Condonation Delay in Himachal Pradesh VAT Act — Section 5 Limitation Act Applicable. High Court's revisional power under Section 48 of the HP VAT Act, 2005 includes power to condone delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 as Section 29(2) applies unless expressly excluded.

25 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment dated 19.11.2018, which refused to condone delay in filing rev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Civil Suit for Medical Negligence Despite Prior Consumer Forum Dismissal. Principle of Res Judicata Not Applicable to Consumer Forum Decisions Under Section 9 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

15 Oct 2019

The case involves a dispute over medical negligence leading to the death of a baby boy. The respondents (parents) initially filed a complaint before t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Caste Validity Suit — Limitation Period Under Article 58 Not Applicable as Suit Sought Consequential Relief. Suit for Declaration and Setting Aside of Scrutiny Committee Order Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, and Filed Within Time.

8 Apr 2019

The appellant, Gulab Ayubkhan Pathan, filed a suit (Special Civil Suit No.5 of 2017) before the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Appeal by Widow Under Section 9 of MEPS Act. Widow of Dismissed Employee Can Maintain Appeal as Right Survives to Legal Representative for Service and Monetary Claims.

27 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Yogeshwari Shikshan Sanstha and Swami Ramanand Tirth College, challenged an order of the School Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 15.1.2016...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Electricity Supply Dispute — Holds that Disputes Between Licensees Fall Within Exclusive Jurisdiction of State Electricity Regulatory Commission Under Section 86(1)(f) of Electricity Act, 2003. The court interpreted the word 'and' in Section 86(1)(f) disjunctively, covering disputes between licensees inter se, and rejected the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as the civil suit was barred.

28 Mar 2016

The plaintiff, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL), a distribution licensee, filed a civil suit for damages against defendant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Lease Dispute. Suit for declaration of tenancy and injunction is not barred by Section 81-B of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act as Collector's order under Section 80 does not bar civil suit.

11 Dec 2015

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the Municipal Corporation of City of Jalgaon challenging an order of the Civil Judge, Senior D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Limitation for Execution of Decree Not a Bar to Fresh Suit for Possession Based on Title. The court held that the right to recover possession based on title is not extinguished merely because a previous decree for possession has become time-barred for execution under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Mar 2014

This second appeal arises from a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs). The responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Alternative Remedy Under Section 351 Available.

13 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Abdul Karim Ahmed Mansoori, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 1st August...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Dispute. Court holds that Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC requires the plaint to be read as a whole and the defence cannot be considered for deciding whether the suit is barred by law.

26 Feb 2013

The petitioners, original defendants, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 26.04.2011 passed by the Ci...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)