Search Results for "Detenue Statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Detenue Statement"

113 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's representation not considered independently, violating Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(2) of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Smt. Marry Usha, wife of the detenu Gnana Prakash, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximate Link Between Offences and Public Order. Preventive detention set aside as criminal activities did not disturb public order, only law and order.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Sangita Nandu Toradmal, mother of the detenue Sanket @ Khoonkhar Dadya Nandu Toradmal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Material Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the detenue's bail status and the lack of independent material vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act, 1981.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Narasu Patil, a detenue, challenged an order of detention dated 12th October 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Than...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in PASA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives and Inadequate Material Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider whether the detenue can be dealt with under regular law before resorting to preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

28 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Rahul Jyoti Sahani, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 (as extended to Dadr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order at Pre-Execution Stage Due to Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Grounds of Detention Were Vague and Stale.

19 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Karnaram Lumbaji Choudhary, challenged a detention order dated 8th March 2018 passed by the Joint Secretary, Government of India, unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

26 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Specification of Period — Blanket Order Invalid Under Section 3(2) Proviso. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 mandates specification of detention period in the order, and a blanket order without such specification is invalid.

23 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Sadashiv s/o Shriram Jadhav, challenged the legality and correctness of a detention order dated 18.9.2020 passed by the Collector and ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Long Incarceration. Accused Not Named in FIR and No Direct Evidence of Involvement Under Section 302 IPC.

26 Jul 2019

The petitioners, accused Nos. 1 and 2, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Gold Smuggling — High Court's Quashing Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind Regarding Bail Likelihood. The Court held that the detaining authority must record satisfaction of imminent bail possibility, but service of documents within statutory period is valid.

18 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against the Bombay High Court's judgment dated 25.06.2019 quashing preventive detention orders passed under S...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Communication of Grounds of Detention. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Grounds Not Served Within Statutory Period.

10 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Bidisha Goin, wife of the detenu Pandian Muruganathan @ Shiva Pandian, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)