Search Results for "Detenue"

521 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Bootlegger for Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detenue Classified as Bootlegger Under Section 2(b) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, but No Evidence of Disturbance to Public Order or Tranquility.

The petitioner, Nasimbanu @Aapa Gulhasan Mohamdsral Kureshi, was preventively detained by an order dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking Detenue's Activities to Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Ajay @ Kaalu @ Chhotu Naginbhai Patani, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, vide order dated 03.01.202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The petitioner, Aveshbhai @ Avlo Aiyubbhai Odiya (Pinjara), was preventively detained by an order dated 09.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance of public order.

The petitioner, Hardikgiri Mahendragiri Goswami, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, under an order dated 27.12.2025...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking Detenue's Activities to Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Nagjibhai Prabhatbhai Rabari, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, under the Gujarat Prevention of An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking Detenue's Activities to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance of public order.

The petitioner, Dinesh Gagubhai Makwana (Ahir), was preventively detained by the District Magistrate, Morbi, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-soci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenue's bail status and the availability of alternative remedies under ordinary law, rendering the detention order invalid.

The petitioner, Ram Raju @ Jatalya Umap, challenged a preventive detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 9 months and 21 days between arrest and detention order held to be fatal, vitiating the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order dated 13.06.2012 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservati...