Search Results for "Delhi Factories Rules 1950"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Educational Institution Challenging Provident Fund Applicability. Establishment Not Exempt Under Section 16(1)(a) or (b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 as It Uses Power and Employs More Than 20 Persons.

The appellant, M/s. Aniket College of Social Work, is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and the Maharashtra Public Trust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Rule 17(2) of the PAN Rules, 2019 in GST Registration Cancellation Case. Rule requiring PAN Aadhaar linking for GST registration revival is intra vires the Finance Act, 2017 and not violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Raju Laxman Pachhapure and Amit Pramod Minache, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Club's Appeal Against ESI Interest Demand — Interest Under Section 39(5)(a) of ESI Act, 1948 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Waived. Voluntary Coverage and Deposit of Principal Without Prejudice Do Not Extinguish Statutory Interest Liability.

The appellant, Bombay Gymkhana Limited, a club incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, was initially covered under the Employees' State Ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Application for Quashing Summons in Security Guards Act Violation. Allegations Against Officers as Principal Employers Prima Facie Disclose Offence Under Clause 42 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Scheme, 2002.

The matter arose from a criminal complaint filed by Inspector R.D. Khanorkar under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Gratuity Dispute — Trust Deed and Scheme Capped Gratuity at Statutory Limit Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employer's Gratuity Scheme Did Not Abandon Statutory Ceiling; Employee Entitled Only to Statutory Maximum.

The appeal arose from a dispute between BCH Electric Limited (appellant-employer) and Pradeep Mehra (respondent-employee) regarding the quantum of gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Internal Complaints Committee Report in Sexual Harassment Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Vishaka Guidelines. Committee Constituted Without Independent Member and Proceedings Conducted Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing to Complainant.

The petitioner, Vidya Akhave, an employee of IFCI Ltd., filed a complaint of sexual harassment against respondent No.2, Suneet Shukla. An Internal Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...