Search Results for "Debt restructuring"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of SBI Consortium in Corporate Guarantee Dispute Under IBC. Corporate Guarantees Executed by Corporate Debtor Constitute Financial Debt Under Section 5(8) of IBC, 2016, and Are Enforceable Despite Timing and Stamping Objections.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Appellant Consortium against the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Appeal Against Admission of CIRP Due to Discharge of Debt Through One-Time Settlement. Financial Debt Found to Be Fully Satisfied Prior to Filing of Section 7 Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The present appeal was filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by Mr. Puneet Resutra, the erstwhile Director and Shar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions Against GOL Offshore Ltd. Due to Bona Fide Dispute and Absence of Commercial Insolvency. Debt Not Due and Payable Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns two winding up petitions filed by Export-Import Bank of India and Punjab National Bank (International) Ltd. against GOL Offshore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Borrowers Must Avail Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Instead of Seeking Injunction in Civil Court.

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants, who are borrowers and guarantors, against an order of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High ...