Search Results for "DRT interim relief"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "DRT interim relief"

88 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

High Court

High Court Appoints Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Loan Default Case Under Arbitration and SARFAESI Acts. Applicant Secures Protection for Mortgaged Property in Dispute with Respondents

2 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard two connected applications filed by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited against Inderjeet Sahni and others. The first ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Territorial Jurisdiction and Interim Relief. Held that DRT Ahmedabad had jurisdiction to entertain the bank's recovery application and that the Appellate Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief was justified.

27 Feb 2006

The petitioner, M/s. GTCL Mobile-Com Technology Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, challenged two orders: (1) an order dated 14-11...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Civil Imprisonment Order Against Guarantor in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Failure to Comply with Section 30 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. Court holds that Recovery Officer cannot order arrest without issuing a show-cause notice and giving an opportunity of hearing as mandated by the Act.

11 Apr 2017

The petitioners, including Panther Fincap & Management Services Limited and three individuals, were aggrieved by an order dated 31 May 2007 passed by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Bank's Reauction and Deposit Forfeiture Under SARFAESI Act, 2002. Auction purchaser's failure to pay balance within stipulated time justified forfeiture, with liberty to pursue recovery through independent proceedings.

11 Apr 2023

The appeal arose from a dispute involving auction proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Secur...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Applicants Revision Applications Against Multiple Borrowers in Loan Recovery Case Due to Procedural Deficiencies and Lack of Jurisdictional Error

4 Feb 2026

The High Court dismissed a series of Civil Revision Applications filed by Applicant challenging the dismissal of its applications for restoration of s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds. Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 as Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Authority Over Securitisation Matters, Despite Allegations of Fraud in Assignment Agreement.

26 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a loan agreement dated 26.07.2011, where the appellant acted as a guarantor for a corporate debtor. After the corporate debtor ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors and Borrowers. Court Holds That Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act Provides an Alternative Remedy to Challenge Possession Notices and That Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Should Not Be Entertained When Statutory Remedy Is Available.

5 Jul 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11th September 2015 passed by the Chief Metr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.

10 Mar 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in SARFAESI Act Recovery Case, Reiterates Limited Scope of Article 226 in Private Financial Disputes. The Court held that the High Court cannot entertain writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act actions when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available, and the interim arrangement by the Supreme Court did not confer jurisdiction to decide merits after DRT became functional.

17 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals by a lender bank against orders of the Kerala High Court that entertained writ petitions filed by borrowers (respondents) ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

6 May 2026

The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)