Search Results for "Consolidation Officer"

131 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Cancellation of Revenue Entry in Fragmentation Case — Sale Deed Not Void Ab Initio. Revenue Authorities Cannot Cancel Entries After 17 Years Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Under Gujarat Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The petitioners, Kantibhai Bhagwanbhai Narola and others, purchased agricultural land bearing Revenue Survey No. 651 admeasuring 1 Acre 6 Gunthas and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Determining Paternity and Ownership Rights in Consolidation Disputes under U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.

Relevant Provisions Discussed: U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953: Section 9: Filing of objections during consolidation proceedings. Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Exchange Dispute Under U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 — Exchange Deed Without Permission Void, But Voidable Only at Instance of Gaon Sabha or Land Holder

The appeals arise from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 5th July 2007 concerning a dispute over land rights under the Uttar Pradesh Zamind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Consolidation Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Revenue Authorities. Dispute over land title between family branches resolved based on consistent revenue entries in favor of respondents.

The appeal arose from a land dispute between two branches of a family descended from Sheo Sahai. The respondents' branch, represented by Bechu, claime...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Fragmentation Act Case — Preferential Right of Contiguous Land Owner Upheld. Sale of Fragmented Land to Non-Contiguous Purchaser Violates Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The appellant, Vilas Shivmurti Munde, filed a second appeal against the dismissal of his suit for declaration and injunction. The suit sought to decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Reference to Competent Authority Under Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act — Trial Court Directed to Inquire Whether Tahsildar Was Designated as Competent Authority

The petitioners, Subhash Shripati Patil and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 21.7.2011 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Co-owner Injunction Dispute Under Fragmentation Act. Court upholds concurrent findings that plaintiff proved possession and defendant failed to show ouster, affirming injunction against co-owner.

The appellant, Namdeo Bhau Chavan, was the original defendant in a suit for injunction filed by respondent No.1, Shantabai Kundlika Chavan, who was th...