Search Results for "Collusive decree"

226 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 226 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Registration Act Case — Compromise Decree Not Requiring Registration. Compromise decree relating to suit property does not require registration under Section 17(2)(vi) of Registration Act, 1908.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore Bench dated 13.02.2017, which dismissed the appellants' writ petition c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Held Sham and Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Sham Transaction; Subsequent Purchasers Are Bona Fide Purchasers Without Notice.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 7th December 1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance in Suit Involving Subsequent Purchasers. The trial court had decreed specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands, directing the original vendor and later purchasers to execute a joint sale deed.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands. The first defendant, the owner, agreed to sell the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Tort Conspiracy Suit; Holds High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Revision. Release of One Joint Tort-feasor Not Validly Decided by High Court in Revision from Court-Fee Order.

The dispute arose from a suit for damages filed by the plaintiffs, who were members of an association, against the defendants, also members, alleging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Attachment Order in Execution Proceedings Due to Lack of Notice Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC. Petitioners' Property Attached Without Prior Notice Despite Being Third-Party Purchasers, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, Shashikant Arvindkumar Rajput and others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated ...