Search Results for "Cheque Security"

397 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 397 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The present criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner, Sri R. Rajappa, challenging the judgment of conviction and order on senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Loan Transaction and Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Smt. Jayamma @ Nagamma (respondent) against Smt. Jayamma (petitioner/accused) under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to prove that the cheque dated 06.03.2004 was issued towards a debt or liability that existed on that date, as the liability arose only after 50 days from the contract date.

The appellant, Kala Mines and Minerals, a partnership concern, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; mere denial of signature on cheque not sufficient to rebut presumption.

The appellant, Dharampeth Mahila Urban Credit Cooperative Society Limited (now Dharampeth Mahila Multi State Cooperative Society Limited), filed a cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt Liability. Appellant Society Failed to Establish Loan Agreement and Outstanding Amount Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Dharampeth Mahila Urban Credit Cooperative Society Limited (now Dharampeth Mahila Multi State Cooperative Society Limited), filed a cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque Issued for Repayment of Housing Loan. Court Holds That Rebuttable Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Stands in Favour of Complainant and Accused Failed to Rebut It.

The appellant, Sami Labs Limited, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, M.V. Joseph, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheque Issued as Consideration for Sale Deed. Defence of Security Cheque Rejected as Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 139.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Rajendra Mahadeorao Chaudhary (applicant/original accused) challenging his conviction under...