Search Results for "Central Excise Rules 2002"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Central Excise Rules 2002"

215 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 215 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case — Related Party Transactions Must Be Valued Under Rule 11 CEVR Read with Section 4(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Circular dated 01.07.2002 Clarifying Valuation Method for Mixed Sales to Related and Unrelated Parties Is Binding and Correctly Applied by Revenue.

5 Dec 2022

The present Civil Appeal arises from an order dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition in Central Excise Rebate Case — By-Product Export Rebate Allowed. Input Credit Adjustment Permitted Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for Duty Paid on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Final Product, Even if By-Product is Not Manufactured.

6 Apr 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary (Revision Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Proceedings Against Legal Heir for Company's Central Excise Dues Without Proper Adjudication. Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed on Legal Representative Without Determining Liability Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

13 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Vandana Bidyut Chaterjee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging various notices and communi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case: EOU Job Work for DTA Unit Without Export Violates EXIM Policy. The Court held that a 100% EOU cannot undertake job work for a DTA unit and clear finished goods to the DTA without exporting them, and such clearance is not eligible for concessional duty under Notification No.8/97-CE.

6 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur against the CESTAT order that allowed the appeals of M/s Universal Ferro & A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Denial of Denatured Spirit License for Industrial Use. Held that rectified spirit/denatured spirit is not 'intoxicating liquor' under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and that the State cannot refuse license for industrial use under the Bombay Denatured Spirit, Methyl Alcohol and Varnish (Miscellaneous) Rules, 1954.

27 Feb 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Biostar Pharmaceuticals Limited and Mr. Ashok Bora, filed two writ petitions challenging the refusal of the State Excise authori...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Duty Drawback Case — Holds Clarificatory Circular Retrospective. Circular No. 35/2010-Cus. dated 17.09.2010, being clarificatory and benevolent, applies retrospectively to exports made prior to its effective date, and the customs component of AIR duty drawback is available even if excise rebate availed.

1 Jan 2025

The appellant, M/s Suraj Impex (India) Pvt. Ltd., a merchant exporter of Soyabean Meal, claimed All Industry Rate (AIR) duty drawback at 1% under Cust...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

1 Sep 2020

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)