Search Results for "CLB order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "CLB order"

70 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Transfer Dispute — Transfer Under Scheme of Amalgamation is Transmission by Operation of Law, Not Subject to Pre-emption. The court held that a transfer of shares pursuant to a court-sanctioned scheme of amalgamation is a transmission by operation of law and not a voluntary transfer, thus pre-emption rights under Articles of Association do not apply.

1 Mar 2016

The case involves a company appeal against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) allowing a petition under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CLB Order Refusing Reference to Arbitration. Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 10F of Companies Act, 1956 Precludes Exercise of Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of Constitution.

26 Apr 2016

The petitioners, Emgee Housing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Not Maintainable in Arbitration Reference Case. Full Bench holds that an order under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 referring parties to arbitration is not appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, as the Arbitration Act is a self-contained code.

27 Nov 2014

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to decide a reference on the maintainability of an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Paten...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order Directing Payment of Gratuity Under Consent Terms — Contractual Obligation Binding Despite Statutory Ineligibility Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971. Consent terms in company petition under Sections 397 and 398 of Companies Act, 1956, requiring payment of gratuity to resigning director, enforced by CLB.

10 Jul 2015

The case arose from a company petition filed by Appellant No.2 before the Company Law Board (CLB) against Appellant No.1 and the Respondent under Sect...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Challenging CLB Order Allowing Ingress into Plant Disputed under Business Transfer Agreement. Court Notes Contradictory Affidavits and Abuse of Process by Appellant in Claiming Possession.

30 Nov 2015

The appeal arose from a Company Law Board order allowing Respondent No. 2, Rajinder Kumar Malhotra (RKM), access to Plant No. 2 of Vidyut Metallics Pv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Delay Condonation Application in Company Appeal — Limitation Period Under Section 10F of Companies Act, 1956 Runs from Date of Knowledge of Order, Not from Receipt of Certified Copy. The court held that the right to receive a certified copy under Regulation 29(4) of CLB Regulations does not postpone the commencement of limitation, and the appeal filed beyond 120 days from the date of knowledge is barred.

11 Mar 2014

This judgment concerns a company application filed by Jagdish Lal Gupta, the appellant in an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...

High Court

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2015

9 Feb 2016

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a direction in an order dated 21.10.2013, passed in Company Application (L) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Enforcement of Singapore Anti-Suit Order in NCLT Oppression and Mismanagement Dispute. Court holds that disputes under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 are non-arbitrable and exclusively triable by NCLT, and that an anti-suit injunction from a foreign court cannot be enforced in India to prevent a party from pursuing statutory remedies before the NCLT.

11 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Anupam Mittal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking an anti-anti-suit injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing an ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)