Search Results for "CIRP withdrawal"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Involving Trademark Ownership Dispute. The Court upheld NCLAT's finding that NCLT's declaration of trademark ownership impermissibly modified the approved Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The appeal arose from a dispute over trademark ownership in the context of a corporate insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankrupt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeals by Appellant Creditor in IBC Case -- Sets Aside Orders Directing Appellant to Approach GIDC Appellate Authority and Remitting Resolution Plan -- Termination of Lease During Moratorium Held Invalid Under Section 14 of IBC

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) allowed two appeals filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) and the largest financial creditor o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Settlement and Disposes of Appeal Against CIRP Admission Under Section 7 of IBC. The appeal against admission of corporate debtor into CIRP was settled between the director and the financial creditor, leading to setting aside of the NCLT order.

The case involves an appeal filed by Smt. Kandala Vijaya, Director of the suspended board of Deepika Infratech Private Limited, against an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Case — NCLT Cannot Dismiss Petition Without Applying Mind to Merits. Adjudicating Authority Must Determine Default and Admit or Reject Petition Under Section 7, Not Direct Settlement Without Considering Individual Claims.

The present appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging MSME Facilitation Council Reference and Award — Held That Section 18 of MSMED Act, 2006 Does Not Require Prior Agreement for Reference and That Limitation Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to Setting Aside of Award.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Morarjee Textiles Ltd., its Head of Finance, and its Executive Director and Chairperson, challengi...