Search Results for "CESTAT remand"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "CESTAT remand"

59 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Customs Classification Disputes Over LCD Panels. LCD Panels Classified Under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, Not as Parts of Television Sets or Car Audio Systems Under General Headings.

29 Mar 2023

The appeals involved disputes over the customs classification of imported LCD panels by two assessees, M/s Videocon International and M/S Harman Inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Challenging Service Tax Demand and Section 35F Validity — Petitioner Relegated to Alternate Remedy of Appeal. Constitutional challenge to Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 not entertained as validity already upheld; factual disputes remitted to appellate authority.

10 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Tyresoles India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 14 October 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Central Exci...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Service Tax Demand on Repair and Maintenance of Roads and Runways. The petition challenged the order-in-original classifying road repair under taxable service and imposing tax, interest, and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, with the court examining the impact of retrospective exemption under the Finance Act, 2012.

18 Jul 2016

The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in construction, repair, and maintenance of roads and runways, held serv...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order in Service Tax Case — Limitation Bar Not Applicable. The court held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds when the appeal was filed within the prescribed period under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994.

4 Jul 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Practice Strategic Communications India Private Limited, a company providing management services, was issued a show cause notice ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Detention Notice in Customs Act Matter — Pre-deposit Adjustment Sought. Court holds that amounts deposited during investigation and audit can be adjusted towards mandatory pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 for maintaining appeal.

9 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s Bhatia Global Trading Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution before the High Court of Karnatak...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Rejection of Settlement Applications by Customs Settlement Commission for Non-Compliance with Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962. Petitioners Argued That Non-Payment of Interest Under Repealed Section 28AB Could Not Be Ground for Rejection, and Orders Were Arbitrary.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, a father-son duo engaged in importing old and used cranes, faced three show cause notices issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intell...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Customs Valuation Order for Lack of Proper Adjudication on Related Party Transaction. The court set aside the Deputy Commissioner's order adding US$ 20 lakhs as technical know-how fee under Rule 9(1)(c) of Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, for failure to first determine whether the relationship between the importer and foreign supplier influenced the price.

19 Jun 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Fairfield Atlas Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of transmission gears and imported cutting tools from related persons. Th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Show Cause Notice Issued After Six Years Held Time-Barred as Assessee Did Not Suppress Facts.

22 Jun 2011

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, Excise a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside CESTAT Order for Lack of Reasons in Central Excise Refund Case — Remands to Tribunal for Fresh Adjudication. The Tribunal failed to record reasons while reversing the Commissioner's order, violating principles of natural justice under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

24 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 21st September 2004 passe...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)