Search Results for "CDRs"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Sustained as Chain of Circumstances Complete and Inconsistencies in Defence Explanation Found Fatal.

The present appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 18.12.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune District in Sessions Case No. 823/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances, Particularly with Recovery of Gold Chain Lacking Corroboration.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Cheating and Forgery Case Citing Parity and Long Incarceration. Investigation Complete, No Custodial Interrogation Required Under Section 439 CrPC.

The judgment pertains to bail applications filed by three applicants — Aditya Avinash Sood, Arunkumar Devnath Singh, and Vishal SurendraKumar Agarwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Manohar Ketkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, for the murder of his wife Manisha under Section 302 IPC and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Allegations of Repeated Rape and Criminal Intimidation Found Vague and Contradictory, Not Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Sections 366, 376(2)(n), 323, 504, 506, 341 IPC and Sections 3, 25 Arms Act.

The applicant, Dr. Avinash Manohar Warjurkar, accused no.1 in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2017 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty in Bride Burning Case — Acquittal of Co-Accused for Dowry Death Upheld. Dying declaration of deceased wife found reliable and corroborated; demand of dowry not proved to be 'soon before death' under Section 304B IPC.

The case involves two appeals arising from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Sessions Case No. 26 of 2009. The appellant, Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute with BBMP — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Section 194C of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not apply to compulsory acquisition of land by municipal authority as it is not a 'work contract'.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Income Tax Officer) under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961...