Search Results for "Branding Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Branding Agreement"

44 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Lack of Counterclaim. The award was found patently illegal as it granted compensation to an investor who had not filed any claim or counterclaim, based on a misconception from conciliation proceedings.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a stockbroker's operational error in handling a Margin Trading Facility account for an investor, leading to the auction of shar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Discharges Accused in CBI Case for Alleged Procurement Irregularities in SAFAR Project. Court holds that mere procedural lapses without proof of criminal intent or loss do not constitute offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860.

9 Sep 2024

The case arises from a CBI investigation into alleged irregularities in the procurement of Digital Display Systems for the SAFAR project by the Indian...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Against Bootlegger Under MPDA Act — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of Witness Statements Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not consider bail orders and verification of anonymous witnesses was flawed, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

8 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Dhanubai @ Dhanno Yashvant Netlekar, challenged an order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon, detaining her as...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Madras High Court Directions in Formula 4 Racing PIL - Contractual Obligations Under MoU Cannot Be Unilaterally Altered by Court. The Court held that the High Court erred in directing the appellant to reimburse the State's expenditure and deposit future costs, as such directions contradicted the express terms of the MoU between the parties.

1 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court considered appeals against an order of the Madras High Court dated 19.02.2024, which disposed of several public interest litigations...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in PMLA Case for Lack of Scheduled Offence. Attachment of properties under Section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 set aside as predicate offence was not a scheduled offence under PMLA.

23 Aug 2021

The petitioners, Sunlight Housing Development Pvt. Ltd., Mukesh Doshi, Kaushal Doshi, and Mack Star Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint — Permanent Stoppage of Increments Set Aside as Disproportionate. The Industrial Court, under Section 30 of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, can set aside a punishment if it is shockingly disproportionate to the misconduct, even if the domestic enquiry was valid.

3 May 2014

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenging an order of the Industrial Court, whic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Operation of Deccan Odyssey Luxury Train Outside Maharashtra. Court holds that the train was conceived as a national tourism project and its operation outside the state does not violate any statutory or contractual obligation.

17 Sep 2010

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Harshad Gawade, an agriculturist and local tour operator, challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages for Illegal Termination. Services Rendered at Different Units of Same Employer Counted Together for Computing 240 Days Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

15 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited, challenged an award of the First Labour Court, Nagpur, which directed reinstatemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Rent Control Case — Eviction Set Aside Due to Invalid Notice Under Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents Act. Notice demanding arrears of rent must give 15 clear days as per Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, and service on 30th April demanding payment by 15th May does not comply.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant No.1, Anil Gangekar, against the judgment and decree of eviction passed...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)