Search Results for "Billing error"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Billing error"

46 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Orders — Lack of Proper Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside due to failure to provide adequate opportunity to the consumer.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed by the Superin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Telecom Billing Dispute — Claim Barred by Section 15 of TRAI Act, 1997. Counterclaim for unpaid bills upheld with 12% interest as petitioner failed to challenge tariff orders before TRAI or Appellate Tribunal.

30 Jul 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Kansan Communications Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over Transferable Duty Free Licence. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and rejection of claim for damages based on alleged breach of warranty regarding transferability of advance licence.

10 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order in Electricity Transmission Dispute — CERC's Power to Grant Compensation Upheld. The Court held that the CERC's regulatory functions under Section 79 of the Electricity Act, 2003 include the power to grant compensation for delay, and such power is not subordinate to regulations under Section 178.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Power Grid Corporation of India Limited against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which ha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

7 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Enhanced Demand in Electricity Theft Case — Appellate Authority Cannot Enhance Contract Demand Without Cross-Objection. Maximum demand for electricity charges cannot be increased by appellate authority in absence of cross-objection by the board under the Electricity Act, 2003.

26 Mar 2018

The petitioner, M/s Ravi Steel Industries, a partnership firm, challenged two appellate orders passed by the Appellate Authority (respondent No.2) und...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order in Company Petition for Oppression and Mismanagement — Upholds Finding That Petition Was Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Consent Under Section 399 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that consent of members under Section 399 must be obtained prior to filing the petition and cannot be cured after filing.

16 Apr 2018

The case involves an appeal against the order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dismissing Company Petition No.4 of 2007 filed by the appellants under Se...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal of Sugar Factory in Central Excise Duty Dispute — Section 11-D of Central Excise Act, 1944 Applies Even When Exemption Under Section 5-A is Available. The court held that the amount collected as duty from buyers is recoverable under Section 11-D regardless of exemption, and the assessee cannot retain such amount.

8 Sep 2017

The appellant, Jalna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory, filed a first appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)