Search Results for "Banking Regulation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Banking Regulation"

253 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 253 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

28 Apr 2026

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Judicial Scrutiny of RBI's Supersession of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank's Board. Balance between Constitutional mandates and banking regulations reaffirmed.

18 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court assessed the legality of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Borrowers' Right to Hearing in RBI Fraud Classification Directions. The Court held that principles of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem, must be read into the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions 2016 to prevent arbitrariness, as classification entails serious civil consequences under Clauses 8.9.4 and 8.9.5.

27 Mar 2023

The civil appeals arose from challenges to the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FCRA Amendments in Challenge by NGOs — Restrictions on Foreign Contribution Transfers and Mandatory Account in SBI New Delhi Held Reasonable. Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sections 7, 12(1A), 12A, and 17(1) of Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020 as Not Violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21.

8 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns the constitutional validity of amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) introduced by the Foreign Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against RBI Guidelines Prohibiting Merchanting Trade in Banned Goods During Pandemic. Clause 2(iii) of the 2020 MTT Guidelines is a reasonable restriction under Article 19(6) as it serves the legitimate aim of preserving domestic PPE stocks and is not manifestly arbitrary.

6 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court upholding Clause 2(iii) of the Revised Guidelines on Merchanting Trade Transactions ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

1 Jan 2021

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging RBI's Directions to Cooperative Bank — RBI's Directions Under Section 35A of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Natural Justice. The Court Held That Section 35A Does Not Require a Prior Hearing and the Directions Were Issued in Public Interest to Protect Depositors.

6 Oct 2018

The petitioners, The Veershaiva Cooperative Bank Ltd. and its employees' union, filed a writ petition challenging the directions issued by the Reserve...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders in Debt Recovery Proceedings Against Dr. Vijay Mallya. Court upholds the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal to proceed with recovery actions under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, rejecting the petitioner's challenge based on pending criminal proceedings and alleged lack of territorial jurisdiction.

5 Oct 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Dr. Vijay Mallya challenging orders passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in recovery proceedin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Former Bank Employees Seeking Pension After Resignation — Resignation Not Equivalent to Voluntary Retirement Under Bank of India (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995. The court held that resignation is a voluntary act of giving up employment and does not entitle an employee to pension under Regulation 22 of the Bank of India (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995, as the petitioners had not completed 20 years of qualifying service and their resignations were not treated as voluntary retirement.

21 Jul 2017

The petitioners were former employees of the Bank of India who had resigned from service. They filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the bank to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Foreign Bank's Surrender of Licence Does Not Affect Pending Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal is determined at the time of filing the application and subsequent cessation of banking business does not oust its jurisdiction under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

23 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Isibars Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, had availed credit facilities from Commerzbank AG, a German ban...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)