Search Results for "BEST Bus"

303 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal by GSRTC and Cross-Objection by Claimants in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld, Compensation of Rs.3,12,000 Affirmed. Tribunal's Assessment of Income and Multiplier Found Correct Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of Shantilal Mavjibhai Vaghela, who died in a collision between a car an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Corporation's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Cross-Objection in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Established, Compensation Enhanced by 10% for Future Prospects.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of Shantilal Waghela, who died in a road accident on 17.11.2010. The dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Due to Invalid Service of Summons. Service by affixture without prior attempt at personal service held invalid under Order V Rule 17 CPC, and ex-parte decree set aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The appellant, M/s Arjun Travels, a sole proprietorship concern, was the owner of a vehicle involved in a motor accident. The respondents, being the l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret Information Not Forwarded to Superior Officer, Search Vitiated.

The appellant, Kallumal Jaidmal Kukareja @ Kallumama, was convicted by the NDPS Special Judge, Greater Bombay, for an offence punishable under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Truck Driver Held Solely Negligent in Head-On Collision with S.T. Bus. Contributory Negligence Not Established as Bus Had Crossed Bridge and Truck Fell Off, Based on Spot Panchnama and Evidence.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition (No. 84 of 1995) filed by Ravikant Padmakar Tarekar, the driver of a State Transport bus, who sus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Truck Driver Held Solely Negligent in Head-On Collision with S.T. Bus. Contributory Negligence Not Established as Bus Had Crossed Bridge and Truck Fell Off, Based on Spot Panchnama and Evidence.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition (No. 84 of 1995) where the claimant, Ravikant Padmakar Tarekar, was the driver of an S.T. Bus (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Conviction for Possession of Hashish Set Aside as Search and Seizure Were Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Their Rights.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Satyawan Pagi (A1) and Vimal Singh (A2) against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(...