Search Results for "Ayurvedic practitioners"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Student Attendance Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII CPC not available to re-agitate merits where examination already concluded.

The applicant, Ankita Jagannath Sonawale, a post-graduate law student at Maharashtra National Law University, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, was disallowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Constitutional Challenge to National Commission of Homeopathy Act, 2020 by Private Homeopathic Medical Colleges. Dispute Concerns NEET Requirement, Counseling Process, and Fee Fixation for Academic Year 2022-23.

The Karnataka High Court heard a writ petition filed by an association of private homeopathic medical colleges and several individual colleges challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Retiral Benefits of Ayurvedic Medical Officer - Petitioner Entitled to Higher Pay Scale and Full Pension, Gratuity with Interest. The court directed payment of retiral benefits with 6% interest from retirement date within three months.

The petitioner, Digambar Vitthal Gaikwad (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), was appointed as a Medical Officer on 5 December 1978 holding t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ayush Doctor Recruitment Process — No Merit Found in Challenge to Notification and Examination Schedule. Petition under Article 226 seeking withdrawal of notification and restraint on examination dismissed as devoid of substance.

The petitioners, Sahel Ahmad Wakeel Ahmad Quadri and Jamil Ahmed Khan Yawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Closure of Electro Homeopathy Clinics — Petitioners Not Qualified to Practice Medicine Under Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Electro Homeopathy Not a Recognized System of Medicine Under the Act.

The petitioners, Veerappa and Shivappa, were doctors practicing Electro Homeopathy in Karnataka. They challenged an order dated 19.09.2011 and a notic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeal Against Dismissal of Maintainability Challenge in Termination Dispute. Institution Recognised by Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 is Excluded from Karnataka Education Act, 1983, Rendering Tribunal Proceedings Without Jurisdiction.

The appellant, Dakshin Bharath Hindi Prachar Sabha (Karnataka), an educational institution, filed a writ appeal against an order of a learned Single J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty and Desertion, Dismisses Wife's Cross-Appeal for Restitution of Conjugal Rights. Marriage Irretrievably Broken Down Due to Mutual Allegations and Separation Since 2014.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a matrimonial dispute between Dr. Ravishankar Navhat (husband) and Dr. Vaishali Navhat (wife), both m...