Search Results for "Awareness"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Awareness"

291 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 291 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPID Act for Non-Supply of Vital Bail Documents. Failure to furnish bail application and order to detenu violated Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8(b) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

24 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Hemchand Somnath Gupta, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offender...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash Cheque Dishonour Proceedings - Complaint Filed by Special Power of Attorney Holder Upheld as Maintainable Despite Omission of Awareness Averment. Court Held That Since Special Power of Attorney Holder Was Signatory to Underlying Sale Deed Transaction, Omission Was Not Fatal, and Pendency of Civil Suit for Recovery Does Not Bar Criminal Prosecution Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

13 Mar 2026

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed by the petitioners, who were accused in a cheque dishonour case, seeking to q...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes Habeas Corpus Petition as Detenue Not Under Illegal Detention — Adult Woman Voluntarily Married Petitioner and Wishes to Join Him. The court held that an adult woman with an MBA degree is capable of making her own decisions and was not under illegal detention, thus no writ of habeas corpus was warranted.

9 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Gnanavel, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to prod...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs State of Uttar Pradesh to Expedite Premature Release Cases for Life Convicts Under Article 32. The Court held that the State must apply its premature release policies non-arbitrarily and transparently, considering cases based on the policy in force on the date of conviction or any more liberal subsequent policy, and set a deadline for disposal of pending cases.

6 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court of India, in a proceeding under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed grievances concerning the premature release of life convic...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Issues Directions for Effective Implementation of POCSO Act in Public Interest Litigation. Court Directs Appointment of Nodal Officers, Awareness Programs, and Timely Victim Compensation Under Section 40 of POCSO Act, 2012.

23 Feb 2022

The petitioners, three women residents of Bangalore, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bangladeshi National in NDPS Case — No Conscious Possession of Narcotics Established. Petitioner's Toilet Kit Contained 0.5 gm Heroin Without His Knowledge; Court Held That Mere Presence of Contraband in Baggage Without Awareness Does Not Constitute Offence Under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act, 1985.

14 Nov 2017

The petitioner, M. A. Latif Shahrear Zahedee, a Bangladeshi national and businessman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail Application and Acquittal in Main Case Not Considered. Failure to Consider Pending Bail Application and Subsequent Acquittal in Substantive Offence Vitiated Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Sanaullah Abdul Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 23.12.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Pol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu Already in Judicial Custody — Failure to Consider Less Drastic Remedy Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that a preventive detention order cannot be sustained when the detenu is already in custody and the detaining authority fails to consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic remedies such as cancellation of bail.

4 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Sagar Prakash Bhosale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 1 June 2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The court held that the detaining authority must ensure grounds are communicated in a language known to the detenu to enable effective representation, and failure to do so renders the detention order invalid.

28 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Firoz Hyder Shaikh @ Kalya Firoz, was detained under a preventive detention order dated 5th September 2011 passed by the Commissioner ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)