Search Results for "Award under 1894 Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Award under 1894 Act"

1128 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1128 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

2 Jan 2025

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement for Agricultural Land Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in not granting statutory benefits under Section 23(1A) and Section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and that the acquired land was agricultural, not non-agricultural, entitling the claimants to higher compensation.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Navi Mumbai Airport Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Sections 4, 6, 9, 11 — Petitioner failed to prove ownership or possession of acquired land; compensation rightly awarded to recorded tenants.

2 May 2023

The petitioner, Ashok Hari Shitlani, filed a writ petition challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Consent Award Under Section 11 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Remains Valid Despite Land Owner's Refusal to Accept Compensation, Precluding Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for resettlement of Narmada Project oustees. The re...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

21 Apr 2022

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Mandamus for Land Acquisition Due to Lapsed Reservation and Financial Incapacity. Reservation under Development Plan Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966, and Acquisition Not Mandated as Corporation Lacked Funds Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute involved a land reservation under the Kolhapur development plan sanctioned in 1999 for public purposes like parking and garden. The landow...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

17 Aug 2020

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Case — Purchase After Section 4 Notification Confers No Right to Challenge Acquisition or Invoke Section 24 of 2013 Act.

14 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered whether a purchaser of land after issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can invoke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Airport Development — Acquisition Not Vitiated by Delay or Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners failed to demonstrate that the acquisition was for a purpose other than public purpose or that the procedure under the Act was not followed.

5 May 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Suretech Hospital & Research Centre Limited and M/s. Vighnaharta Builders and Developers challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases for Airport Expansion — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal to Interfere with KIADB Acquisition. Landowners' challenge to acquisition for Hubli Airport expansion fails as court finds no violation of statutory provisions under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

28 Mar 2013

The case involves four writ appeals filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their land by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)