Search Results for "Apprentices Act"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Non-Resident Employees Held as Salary, Not Business Income. Section 28(va) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not apply to employment-related payments.

The appeal was filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compassionate Appointment After 17 Years Delay. Petitioner failed to apply within prescribed time limits under Government Resolutions of 1985 and 1996, and no continuing cause of action existed.

The petitioner, Pawan Dinkar Palaskar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad Bench, dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award for Liquidated Damages in Trainee Bond Dispute — Liquidated Damages of Rs. 2 Lakhs Upheld as Reasonable Pre-Estimate of Loss

The petitioners, Madhur Pandey (trainee) and his guarantors (mother and aunt), challenged an arbitral award dated 7 September 2011 passed by a sole ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workers' Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case Against Textile Mill. Held that the Industrial Court's finding of no unfair labour practice under MRTU & PULP Act was based on evidence and not perverse.

The petitioners, workers employed by respondent no. 1 (Shri Ram Mills), filed a complaint before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognitio...