Search Results for "Alamelu case"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Alamelu case"

37 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Unconditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit Under Order 37 CPC — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Loan Repayment and Promissory Note Execution. The court set aside the trial court's conditional leave order requiring 50% deposit, holding that the defendants raised substantial triable issues under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC.

26 Mar 2026

The case arises from a summary suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff, A. Kanagarajan, against the petitioners/defendants, M/s. Sri MVR Logistics Priv...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Act Case Due to Inadequate Age Proof and Inadmissible Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 6 of POCSO Act, 366 and 376 of IPC Overturned

27 Feb 2026

The appellant was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 6 of POCSO Act read with Section 376 of IPC and Section 366 of IPC, involvin...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR Led to Benefit of Doubt for Accused Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and SC/ST Act.

9 Jan 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(i) and 376(2)(j) IPC set aside as prosecution could not establish minority of victim.

2 May 2023

The appellant, Maherban Hasan Babu Khan, was convicted by the Special Court at Mangaon, District Raigad, for offences under Sections 4 and 6 of the Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

9 Mar 2020

The appellant, Lahu Bhausaheb Sonwane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Share Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. MOU for Sale of Shares Held Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Show Financial Capacity to Pay Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time.

22 Dec 2018

The appellants, plaintiffs in the suit, filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment of the trial Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Sexual Assault.

7 Jun 2018

The appellant, Dadarao Gotiramji Khandare, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Amravati, under Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence on Age of Victim. Consent of Victim Above 16 Years Renders Sexual Intercourse Not Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

4 Jan 2018

The appellant, Ashok Pande, was convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape of a minor girl, Latiba (PW2), and sentenced to seven years rigorous imprison...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

2 Nov 2017

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Admits Second Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit Where Possession Claimed Under Tenancy, Framing Substantial Question on Civil Court's Duty to Refer Tenancy Dispute to Land Tribunal. The appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 raises the issue whether Section 133 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 mandates reference to Land Tribunal when the claim for injunction is based on alleged tenancy rights.

7 Jan 2016

The dispute concerns agricultural land bearing Sy.No.46 measuring 1.84 acres at Muddapura Village, of which the plaintiff claimed possession as a tena...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)