Search Results for "Age of victim"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 366A, 344, 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anil S/o Bhayrappa Khairav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTSC-I (POCSO), Vijayapura, in Special Case (POCSO) No.15/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unexplained Delay in FIR. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Testimony of Victim and Witnesses Contained Material Contradictions and Medical Evidence Did Not Corroborate Allegations.

The appellant, Manohar Tikaram Kapgate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Gadchiroli for offences under Sections 448 and 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 354, 363, 342 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

The appellant, Satish s/o Bandu Ragde, was convicted by the Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Special Child Protection Case No. 28 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim. Birth Certificate with overwriting and lack of ossification test render age of victim unproven, vitiating conviction under Sections 376(2)(i),(n) IPC, Goa Children's Act, and POCSO Act.

The appellant, Santosh Gore, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.36/2017 for offences under Section 376(2)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.

The appellant, Somappa @ Swamy, was convicted by the Special Judge, Koppal, in Spl. POCSO (S.C.) No. 35/2015 for offences under Section 376 IPC and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Lack of Consent and Age of Victim Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Govind Shripat Maraskolhe, was convicted by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No. 56/2006 for offences und...