Search Results for "Admission Restoration"

330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Restoration of Appeal in Service Termination Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Bona Fides. Petitioner's conduct of securing benefits while neglecting appeal for 10 years disentitles him to discretionary relief under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, a peon appointed in 1995, was orally terminated in 2006. He filed an appeal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Restoration of Appeal. Delay of 2 years and 2 months not sufficiently explained; court upholds Appellate Court's refusal to condone delay.

The present Writ Petition was filed by the petitioners challenging the judgment and order dated 21.07.2015 passed by the learned Appellate Court in Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Execution Proceedings for Decree Holder. Delay of 13 Years in Filing Execution Application Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown for Non-Filing Due to Pendency of Appeal and Other Proceedings.

The petitioner, M/s. Botanium Limited (now merged in Go Airlines (India) Limited), was the decree holder in Regular Civil Suit No. 292 of 1983. The su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Change of Site for Engineering College Despite AICTE Rejection. AICTE's Rejection of Change of Site Application and Imposition of 'No Admission Category' Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, Hyderabad (Sind) National Collegiate Board and Watumall Institute of Electronics, Engineering and Computer Technology, filed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Appeal Dismissed for Default Under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC — Sufficient Cause Shown for Absence of Appellant and Advocate. Appellant's Explanation of Being Misled by Advocate Accepted as Sufficient Cause for Restoration of Appeal.

The appellant, original defendant in a suit, challenged the judgment and decree of the trial court dated 17th September 1987 by filing an appeal in th...