Search Results for "240 days service"

341 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 341 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Petition for Continuity of Service and Pay Benefits for Reinstated Workers in Labour Dispute - Continuity of Service and Benefits Under Government Resolution Dated 17.10.1988 Granted as Labour Court Awards Were Silent on Continuity, Following Precedent on Reinstatement Principles.

The dispute involved petitioners who were labourers employed by respondent No. 2 between 1985 and 1994, and whose services were terminated on various ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Industrial Disputes Act Case, Reinstating Tribunal Award. Termination Without Section 25F Compliance Held Void Regardless of Appointment Irregularity Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The dispute originated from the termination of daily wage non-teaching staff at Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit. The employees were initiall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Continuous Service Not Established. Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Employment Was Intermittent on Specific Projects.

The Petitioner, Mr. Ashok U. Nikam, a workman, filed a writ petition challenging an award of the Labour Court at Mumbai which rejected his reference u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Mill Challenging Order to Grant Permanency to Re-employed Clerks. Voluntary Retirement Does Not Bar Claim for Permanency for Subsequent Continuous Service Under Industrial Law.

The petitioner, Shree Ram Mills Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which allowed a complaint filed by the respondent union,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Company's Petition and Dismisses Workmen's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 6 Upheld, but Direction for Permanent Status Set Aside for Workmen Not Proving 240 Days Service Under Item 9.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order of the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) Nos.169 of 1993 and 493 of 1993. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workers' Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case Against Textile Mill. Held that the Industrial Court's finding of no unfair labour practice under MRTU & PULP Act was based on evidence and not perverse.

The petitioners, workers employed by respondent no. 1 (Shri Ram Mills), filed a complaint before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reinstatement Order for Daily Wage Worker in Banking Company — 93 Days of Service Does Not Confer Right to Regularisation. The court held that a daily wage worker who worked for 93 days as a badli sepoy is not entitled to reinstatement or permanent absorption.

The petitioner, Dena Bank, a banking company constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Alleging Unfair Labour Practice by Employer. Company's denial of permanency to 15 workmen held not to constitute unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as workmen failed to prove continuous service.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Association of General Workers, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated November 20,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee is already aware of the closure of the establishment.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Municipal Council, Tirora, and its President against common orders passed by the Labour C...