Search Results for "shares transfer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "shares transfer"

1207 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1207 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes PMLA Proceedings Against Advocate Applicant in Money Laundering Case Involving Anil Deshmukh -- Properties Purchased in 2005-2007 Have No Nexus with Alleged 2020-2021 Proceeds of Crime

23 Feb 2026

The High Court allowed the criminal application filed by Applicant under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., quashing the process issued against him by the De...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Summary Judgment in Bank Guarantee Enforcement Case. Court holds that invocation of bank guarantee is independent of underlying contract disputes and must be honoured unless fraud or irretrievable injustice is established.

30 Nov -0001

The case arises from a summary suit filed by Bank of India (the respondent) against the appellants, who were the original defendants, for enforcement ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Section 9 Petition Seeking Interim Measures in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. The petition pertained to disputes between maritime entities and sought urgent interlocutory reliefs pending constitution of the arbitral tribunal.

2 Apr 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 7499 of 2025 filed by Alphard Maritime Ltd. against Samson Mari...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Found to Be in Conflict with Public Policy and Patent Illegality. The Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of the contract was perverse and ignored the express terms, leading to a miscarriage of justice.

9 Jun 2026

The dispute arose out of a contract between ABB India Limited (Petitioner) and Sunil Hariram Jaisingh and Others (Respondents) for the supply and inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found in Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Terms. The court held that the arbitrator's construction of the contract was a possible view and not perverse, thus no interference under Section 34(2-A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Mar 2020

The petitioners, Gateway Distriparks Limited and Gateway Rail Freight Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Status Quo and Appointment of Receiver in Property Dispute. Court Holds That Suit for Declaration and Injunction Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata and That Receiver Cannot Be Removed Without Proper Application.

17 Aug 2022

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (Afzal Khan and others) against the appellants (Mehboob Ayub Khan and others) seeking declarati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Attachment Before Judgment in Commercial Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established. Court held that the balance of convenience did not favor the appellants and that the trial court's discretion in ordering attachment before judgment under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal against an order of attachment before judgment passed by the trial court in a commercial suit. The appellants, who were de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

22 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Foreign Company Failed to Comply with Registration Requirements Under Sections 592 and 599 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner, a foreign company with a place of business in India, cannot maintain a winding-up petition without registering under the Act.

11 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Willis Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its principal place of business in the United Kingdo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial by Magistrate for CBI Case Transferred from Special Judge — Reference Under Section 395(2) CrPC Maintainable for Jurisdictional Doubt. The court held that the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate has jurisdiction to try CBI Special Case No. 47/2000 involving offences under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

4 Jun 2018

The High Court of Bombay, in its suo motu revision application, considered a reference made by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd Court...

27 28 29 30 31

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)