Search Results for "railway administration"

854 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 854 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Allegation of Pushing Victim from Running Train Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Version.

The appellants, Kanchan Deokisanjee Panpalia and Tara Harishkumar Panpalia, were convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Convicts in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Procedural Violations in Search and Seizure Lead to Acquittal of Appellants Convicted Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act.

The appellants, Pratap Bhimsingh Parera, Gangadhar Babaji Lenaka, Mrs. Savita Pratap Parera, and Mrs. Santoshi Santosh Pradhan, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeals in Gang Rape Case; Convicts Challenge Conviction and State Seeks Enhancement of Sentence. Accused Were Convicted Under Sections 376(2)(g) and 366 IPC for Gang Rape of Two Minor Girls and Sentenced to 10 Years Rigorous Imprisonment.

Criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 121 of 1994 were taken up by the High Court of Judica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yadav Rajbahadur Ghyansingh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mehsana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Drug-Laced Banana and Theft Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 328 and 379 IPC set aside as sole witness failed to identify accused in court and prosecution failed to prove administration of intoxicating substance.

The appellant, Rajesh Jatihusain Ansari, was convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 328 (administering...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against MCOCA Charges in Robbery Case — Appellant Fails to Show Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Organized Crime. Court upholds trial court's rejection of discharge, finding sufficient material to proceed under MCOCA for dacoity and robbery offences.

The appellant, Maruti Navnath Sonawane, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Special Judge for MCOCA at B...