Search Results for "raiding party"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Violations of Sections 42(2) and 50 of NDPS Act. Failure to Properly Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer and Non-Compliance with Reporting Requirements Led to Acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondents (Smt. Phallu @ Farida w/o Sayyed Ahmed and others) by the Special Judge for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti s/o Ganpati Sadekar, was a Junior Assistant in the Education Department of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The complainant, Balaji...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c), and 29 of NDPS Act set aside as mandatory procedural safeguards were violated.

The appellant, Salim Jamshed Ali Shaikh @ Kanya, was convicted by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Mumbai, in Special Case No.78 of 2010 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Waman s/o Malhari Jambhulkar, was convicted by the Special Judge (Under Prevention of Corruption Act) and 4th Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Madhukar Nagnathrao Bandale, was a Junior Clerk in Upper Painganga Project, Sub-Division No.3, Isapur. The complainant, Ganpat Kasture ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Conscious Possession. Conviction under Section 21(c) read with Section 8(c) and Section 29 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession and comply with mandatory safeguards.

The appellant, Gilbert Martin Onuoho, was convicted by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Greater Mumbai, in NDPS Special Case No. 70 of 2009 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Kashinath Vikramji Thorat (accused No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Junior Engineer in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the demand of bribe, which is essential for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, a Junior Engineer in the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M.S.E...