Search Results for "indirect transfer"

314 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 314 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of agreement to sell immovable property, finding no grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rajesh V. Choudhary, filed Arbitration Petition No.734 of 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Recusal Application by Advocate in Official Liquidator's Report — Advocate's Conduct Found Obstructive and Discourteous. Court Holds That Adverse Remarks Against Counsel Do Not Automatically Warrant Recusal Unless Bias Is Demonstrated.

The judgment arises from an application/praecipe filed by Advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara on 14th October 2014, requesting that Justice S.J. Kathawalla ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Reinstatement of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Matter — Full Back Wages Awarded for Flawed Inquiry. Syndicate Bank's Dismissal of Clerk for Alleged Misconduct Set Aside as Inquiry Was Vitiated by Bias and Non-Supply of Documents.

The petitioner, Syndicate Bank, a nationalised bank, challenged the Part-I Award dated 28.5.2003 and Part-II Award dated 7.9.2010 passed by the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Material to Show Instigation or Abetment. Allegations of Mental Harassment by Friends of Unrequited Love Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC.

The applicant, Girish Bole, along with others, was accused of abetting the suicide of a young woman, Ekta Pradhan, who set herself ablaze on 29 Februa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...