Search Results for "gratuity interest"

652 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 652 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Directs Release of Leave Encashment to Retired Employee in Service Benefits Dispute. Leave encashment ordered to be paid within eight weeks, with liberty to seek other benefits after pending related petitions are adjudicated.

The petitioner, Dhirendra S/o Kanjibhai Unagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Bank for Alleged Non-Compliance of Terminal Benefits Order. Bank's Affidavit Shows Payment of Eligible Benefits and No Wilful Disobedience Found Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

Background: The contempt petition arose from an alleged non-compliance of a Division Bench order in W.A.No.1493 of 2014 dated 26.03.2024, concerning t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Teacher Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary from Gratuity. Recovery of Rs.1,39,316/- Set Aside as Payment Was Due to Departmental Error Without Misrepresentation by Employee.

The petitioner, Ashok Buchayya Pusalwar, was an Assistant Teacher with the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, appointed on 24-10-1996. He voluntarily retired...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits Under Zilla Parishad and Jeevan Pradhikaran Rules. Court Holds That Prior Service as Daily Wagers Counts Towards Qualifying Service for Pension After Absorption.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Latur, and Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran. The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSRTC Petition in Guarantor Recovery Dispute — Industrial Court Order Set Aside for Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. Co-guarantor cannot claim protection under MRTU & PULP Act against employer of principal debtor as recovery action is not an unfair labour practice.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and order dated 05.10.2016 of the Industrial Court, Nagp...