Search Results for "employer liability"

1022 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1022 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence Not Proved. Deceased Auto Driver Died in Single-Vehicle Capsize; No Evidence of Third-Party Involvement or Negligence, Hence Employer and Insurer Not Liable Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Govindaraj, who died in a motor vehicle accident on February...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Directors Not in Charge of Company Affairs at Relevant Time. Section 138 NI Act Liability Requires Active Role in Business; Vicarious Liability Not Automatic for All Directors.

The petitioners, Heena Thirumali Sateesh and Hanumanth Inamdar, were directors of Hoysala Projects Private Limited. The respondent, M/s Minimelt Engin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Dispute — Clarifies That Sales Tax on Works Contracts Is Levied on Goods Component, Not on Completed Items of Work. Clause 45.2 of GCC Does Not Apply When Tax Is on Transfer of Property in Goods Involved in Works Contract.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court. The dispute arose from works contract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case for Interest from Date of Accident. Employer and Insurer Held Liable to Pay Interest Under Section 4A of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 from the Date of Accident, Not from the Date of Order.

The appellant, a workman, filed an application under Section 22 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 claiming compensation of Rs.2,67,252/- for inj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes PF Order Against Hindustan Lever in Part-Time Doctor Coverage Dispute. Medical Practitioner Not 'Employee' Under Section 7-A of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 as No Employer-Employee Relationship Existed.

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Lever Limited, challenged an order dated 17th October 2003 passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner under Se...