High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Order Passed Under Section 271D of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Penalty Was Imposed for Alleged Violation of Section 269SS Regarding Cash Loans.
25 Feb 2025...
Search Results for "cheque number"
615 result(s) found
Found 615 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
10 Aug 2022The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Trades and Deficiency in Service. The Court held that the arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and negligence were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Dec 2020The case involves appeals filed by IFIN Commodities Limited (the appellant-broker) against an arbitral award that had been upheld by a Single Judge un...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Holds That Payments Made to Authorized Representatives of Partnership Firm Are Valid Under Contract Act. Burden of Proof Shifts to Defendants When Plaintiff Proves Payment to Persons Held Out as Authorized in Brochure.
31 Mar 2017The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Mr. Sharad Prabhudas, against the judgment of the First Appellate Court which rever...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Disqualification of Panch Member for Pecuniary Interest. Court holds that return of amount before meeting cures disqualification under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.
25 Aug 2016The petitioner, Edwin Rodrigues, filed a writ petition seeking disqualification of respondent no.1, Maria Leena Da Cunha, a panch member of the Villag...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.
9 Jun 2015The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Modifies Oppressive Bail Conditions in Section 138 NI Act Case — Personal Bond Without Surety Sufficient. The court held that in summons cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, execution of personal bond and surety bond is not a condition precedent for trial, and Magistrates must not fix oppressive amounts based on the cheque amount.
20 Mar 2015The applicants, Subhash Atmaram Sharma and Mayur Jitendra Shah, were facing trial for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, ...
- 78
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute — Payment to Non-Resident for Software Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Payment for shrink-wrapped software held to be for copyright article, not transfer of copyright rights, thus not taxable as royalty.
9 Mar 2015The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)) against the common order o...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute — Payment to Non-Resident for Software Not Royalty. Payment for purchase of shrink-wrapped software from non-resident held not royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as no copyright transferred.
9 Mar 2015The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appella...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dishonest Intention. Mere dishonour of cheque does not attract Section 420 IPC without proof of fraudulent or dishonest inducement at the time of borrowing.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 86/201...
- 121
