Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"

396 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 396 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows In-Service Doctor to Pursue Post-Graduation Despite Pending Departmental Enquiry. Denial of No Objection Certificate solely on ground of pending disciplinary proceedings held arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Dr. Kailash Kashinathrao Pawar, a Medical Officer (Group A) at Late Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Bhiwandi, applied for a No Object...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR in Forgery Case Due to Bar Under Section 195 Cr.P.C. — Allegations Pertaining to Proceedings Before Revenue Court Require Complaint by That Court.

The petitioner, Anthony Roque D'Souza, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.178/2023 registered at Mapu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Delay Condonation Application in Civil Suit — 228-Day Delay Not Sufficiently Explained. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the explanation for delay was vague and unsupported by evidence, declining to interfere under Article 227.

The petitioners, plaintiffs in a civil suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrary Cancellation of Tender Award. State Warehousing Corporation's Cancellation of Contract Without Reasons or Hearing Held Unreasonable.

The petitioner, M/s Bhagwati Builders, a proprietary concern of Vijay Agrawal, participated in a tender issued by Respondent No.1, Maharashtra State W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders in Suit Under Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in Findings of Courts Below.

The petitioner, M/s Columbia Hospital & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant No.9 in a suit filed by respondent No.1, M/s Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Plaint Cannot Be Rejected After Framing of Issues. Suit for Specific Performance Under MOFA Not Barred by Limitation as Limitation is a Mixed Question of Law and Fact.

The appellant, Mrs. Sicily Varghese Kadamthottu, filed a suit for specific performance against the respondents, who were promoters under the Maharasht...