Search Results for "NDPS Act, 1985"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "NDPS Act, 1985"

397 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 397 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Russian National in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Violations and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction Overturned for Non-Compliance with Search Procedures and Doubtful Arrest Timing

30 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court acquitted Appellant, a Russian national, who was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for posses...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Procedural Non-Compliance and Erroneous High Court Approach. The High Court's reversal of acquittal was set aside as it failed to consider the trial court's reasons and the prosecution did not prove mandatory search procedure under the NDPS Act, leading to restoration of acquittal.

9 Mar 2022

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the High Court reversed the Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in NDPS Case — Failure to Prove Cultivation of Opium Poppy Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution failed to establish that the plants seized were opium poppy due to lack of chemical analysis and independent panch witness testimony.

20 Mar 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 9th May 2000 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Standing Order 1/89 Regarding Representative Sampling of Opium Poppy Plants Renders Prosecution Case Doubtful.

20 Mar 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 3rd May 2000 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Granting Bail and Acquitting Accused, Holding That Wrong Orders Alone Do Not Constitute Misconduct. Disciplinary Action Requires Proof of Extraneous Considerations or Corrupt Motive, Not Mere Errors of Judgment.

26 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the legal representatives of the deceased judicial officer, Krishna Prasad Verma, against the State of B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Conviction for Possession of Hashish Set Aside as Search and Seizure Were Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Their Rights.

2 Mar 2006

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Satyawan Pagi (A1) and Vimal Singh (A2) against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case for Possession of 2.28 kg Charas — Compliance with Section 50 NDPS Act Not Required for Baggage Search. The court held that the search of the handbag and room did not require compliance with Section 50, and the personal search was valid as the accused was given the option to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

27 Oct 2005

The appellant, Ritesh Kumar, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, Mapusa, under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of Charas — Conscious Possession Established. The court held that the presumption of conscious possession under Sections 54 and 35 of the NDPS Act was not rebutted by the appellant, who failed to prove that the contraband belonged to another person.

6 Jul 2005

The appellant, Mohammed Aslam, was convicted by the Special Judge, Goa, in Special Criminal Case No. 35/2001 for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act for Possession of Brown Sugar — Compliance with Section 50 Search Requirements Not Necessary When Accused Refuses Offer of Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate. The court held that the offer to the accused to search the raiding party was sufficient compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, and the quantity of brown sugar recovered (7 gms and 1.4 gms) was commercial quantity, justifying the 10-year sentence.

23 Feb 2005

The appellants, Smt. Aminbi Shaikh Husain and Shri Rafik @ Bhola Abdul Sattar Pathan, were convicted by the Trial Court under the Narcotic Drugs and P...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Orders Refund of Fine Paid After Full Sentence Served in NDPS Case — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.36,113.32 as Default Sentence Already Served. Default sentence already undergone extinguishes liability to pay fine under Section 20(b)(ii) of NDPS Act.

1 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Caitan Fernandes, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, Mapusa, Goa on 31.3.1994 in Special Criminal Case No.19/1993 for an ...

27 28 29 30 31

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)